Blog

We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's Marijuana Tax Controversy

As Michigan navigates a significant crossroads in cannabis policy, attention turns to the newly proposed 24% wholesale marijuana tax, sparking constitutional debate and industry unrest. The impending legal decision surrounding this tax is poised to set precedents that could ripple through cannabis legislation nationwide, affecting pricing dynamics and regulatory frameworks.

Image 2

Regardless of geographical proximity or personal use, this crucial case in Michigan demands national attention. The upcoming verdict could shape future tax regulations and voter-approved legislation strategies across state lines, marking a pivotal moment for the evolving cannabis industry.

Detailed Analysis of Michigan’s Proposal

This initiative, embedded in Michigan’s 2025–2026 budget, introduces a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis aimed at enhancing road infrastructure funding. Applied earlier in the supply chain, this tax augments the existing tax structure alongside:

  • 10% excise tax on end-consumer cannabis sales, a measure first sanctioned by voters in 2018.
  • 6% state sales tax, further intensifying the tax burden.

The introduction of this wholesale tax could render Michigan's cannabis tax regime one of the nation’s most complex and costly.

Rationale Behind the Industry's Legal Action

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has mounted a legal challenge against what it labels an unconstitutional tax. Central to their argument is that any amendment to the 2018 voter-sanctioned marijuana law demands a supermajority vote, a threshold not met in the tax’s legislative enactment. This positions the MCIA as defenders of voter intent, as expressed by spokesperson Rose Tantraphol, highlighting the emphasis on safeguarding democratic decision-making in tax policy formation.

A warning from industry stakeholders indicates that the added fiscal pressure could either exacerbate consumer costs or divert them to less regulated alternatives—a pattern previously observed in states like California.

State Government's Defense

The state of Michigan argues the legitimacy of this tax on several grounds:

  • The wholesale tax represents a new fiscal mechanism, distinct from alterations to the 2018 legislation.
  • Legislative powers permit the creation of taxes addressing fiscal exigencies.
  • Its primary designation is towards infrastructure funding, rather than cannabis regulation amendments.

If endorsed by the courts, the tax is set to be effective from January 1, 2026.

Implications for Consumers and the Market

This tax dispute holds broader implications, particularly as state cannabis tax policies often incite a domino effect on peer states. Should the judicial outcome favor the tax:

  • Wholesale prices are expected to rise, cascading down to retail levels.
  • Higher consumer costs may incentivize a shift towards unregulated markets.
  • Smaller businesses face heightened pressure, possibly resulting in market consolidation.

A repeal would maintain Michigan’s comparatively competitive tax model, characterized by reduced financial burdens on legal cannabis products.

Image 3

National Relevance of Michigan’s Legal Battle

The unfolding legal circumstances in Michigan underscore critical issues:

1. Testing Voter-Approved Laws: A ruling that expands legislative power over ballot-based initiatives could redefine the legislative process in direct democracy states.

2. Influence on Tax Models: States grappling with infrastructural funding gaps might explore similar fiscal measures if Michigan’s strategy proves viable.

3. Highlighting Tax Disparities: The disparity in cannabis taxation nationwide, with some states maintaining competitive rates and others bogged down by high taxes fueling illicit sales, is starkly highlighted by this case.

Anticipated Developments

As the Michigan Court of Claims prepares to release its decision following recent hearings, all eyes are on the potential for escalation to the Michigan Supreme Court. The outcome not only bears significance for Michigan's cannabis industry but also sets a precedent for state-level governance of voter-sanctioned economic policies and burgeoning industries.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.

Our Offices

Our expertise is widespread and we have multiple office locations to make it convenient for you to get help. You can find us at:

Smart Tax Financial, LLC - Riverside, CA (Corporate)

11801 Pierce Street, Ste. 200
Riverside, CA 92505
Hours: M-F 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM By Appointment Only
Phone: (951) 595-4474
Phone: (909) 376-8770
FAX: (951) 479-9199
info@smarttaxfin.com

Smart Tax Financial, LLC - Ontario, CA

3200 Guasti Road, Suite 100
Ontario, CA 91761
Hours: M-F 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM By Appointment Only
Phone: (951) 595-4474
Phone: (909) 376-8770
FAX: (951) 479-9199
info@smarttaxfin.com

Smart Tax Financial, LLC - San Bernardino, CA

473 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 200
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Hours: M-F 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM By Appointment Only
Phone: (951) 595-4474
Phone: (909) 376-8770
Fax: (951) 479-9199
info@smarttaxfin.com

Smart Tax Financial, LLC - Riverside, CA (Retail)

4270 Riverwalk Parkway #102
Riverside, CA 92505
Hours: M-F 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM By Appointment Only
Phone: (951) 595-4474
Phone: (909) 376-8770
Fax: (951) 479-9199
info@smarttaxfin.com
Questions? We have answers.
FAQ
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully